Wednesday, February 2, 2011


In our daily communications with our neighbors, those whom we will deal with or come across in our daily lives, each and every time we articulates some thoughts or ideas or instructions there are things we say directly, outright or explicitly. But aside from what is directly verbalized there are inherent perspective, context and concepts which are not directly or explicitly expressed. In all instances the explicits form the framework to understand the implicits and never the other way around.

For example the statement ‘Everyone wants to live forever, never to die’ while it would (or should anyway) be explicitly clear that to live forever and never die (or for that matter never to grow old andor become incapacitated in some ways) is what everyone would want. But implicit (i.e. not mentioned) is that this do not absolutely applies to everyone alive at any point of time while they are alive but only to those who are clinically sane and also those who are still sufficiently technically sane. But that is not all, it is also implicit that in may not apply to those suffering horrendous afflictions from whatever causes such as distressing diseases (without any perceivable hope of recovery); are being (at the point of time with no hope of release) forcibly tormented or tortured; are being forced to do things against their will andor desire (and are unable to free themselves from such situations); andor even those who are just very unhappy for whatever reasons.

So even as the statement is a general statement, it carries an absolute validity (i.e. absolute truth value) in the context that it implicitly conveyed. And this is the context that while and when everyone is generally (and significantly) happy with their lives and their lives situations, they will want to continue on living indefinitely (i.e. live forever and never die). Additionally (i.e. the additional context of) anyone and everyone sane being an exception, who don't (want to live on indefinitely but want their lives to end) it is because they are basically and significantly unhappy about their lives' situations and especially when they can see no way out from (i.e. the hopelessness and unhappiness of) those situations.

Here is another simple example (just a conceptual example):

A mother called to her daughter and said, ‘Please go to the market tomorrow morning to pick up some tomatoes which we missed out during the weekend.’

From that record alone we can understand the concepts which were explicit:
1. Go to the market. [intent location]
2. The next morning. [intent time]
3. Buy some tomatoes. [intent objective and object]
4. Because they (the tomatoes) were missed out during the weekend trip there. [reason for all intents specified]
5. The time of this communication was not during a weekend.

What were not explicit or directed mentioned andor specified in that record but were implicit:
1. Where the market was.
2. How the daughter was to get there.
3. The daughter was old enough to go to the market on her own.

4. How many or how much tomatoes was she to get.
5. The tomatoes were not urgently needed that day.
6. The tomatoes were going to be needed the next day or soon after.
7. That the family prepared food for their meals (either commonly, regularly, occasionally or very rarely) rather than only just buy ready cooked food or exclusively eat out.

What was not recorded but might be implicit and yet again might not – that which there was not enough information to ascertain unless we were to investigate into a larger scope or context of the conversation that was recorded.
1. Their marketing was routinely done on the weekend.
2. The market only operates in the morning.
3. Whether there were other members in the family aside from the mother and daughter.
4. How far away the market was from them.
5. How regular or irregular were such weekend shopping and how regularly they prepare their own meals instead of buying ready to eat food.

And these types of situation happen as a matter of routine in all our lives. Likewise also in the messages of the Christian Bible there are messages, instructions, commandments, charges, requirements that were not recorded (as mentioned) in some instances because they were implicit to the situations. And most of the time these are very clear, those which were implicit. But there were too many instances where the implicit were not so clear. Those are the times when the students of the Bible have to have a good thorough overview of each such situation described  as well as the consistent messages of the Christian Holy Scriptures in order to correctly understand those which were implicit. This meaning that the students need to look through elsewhere throughout all the rest of the Scriptures to establish what is implicit.

Like all communications the Holy Christian Scripture records are a mixed of explicit commandments and instructions together with explicit and implicit teachings. The key is to know and understand what is truly implicit without adding in your own ideas to twist these records to say something that it didn’t say. For the implicit do not over rule the explicit and the explicit is a framework to understand the implicit. Isn't this just a logical, clear and simple rule to follow with all interpersonal communications?

Here is the main problem – bad faith. The whole of mainstream and much of the rest of professed “Christianity” do not know what the whole of the message of the Christian Bible is for, why GOD had it recorded and preserved for us living today. They (the disciples, experts, leading authorities and the master of these religions) were converted to a religion that was totally not from and not based on the records of the Holy Christian Scriptures. These religions just used some names of some people and selectively selected texts from the Scriptures to formulate their own religions or to incorporate them into some ancient pagan religions which they really subscribe to and plagiarizing the name of Christianity to have something new to appeal to and gain a greater following from their social order. This I have fully and thoroughly proven from all that I have written in this work so far.

Not To Destroy But To Full In Performing

Let us look at the first very explicit statement of the New Testament records that JESUS CHRIST emphatically made when HE began teaching HIS disciples as HE began HIS three and a half year ministry after John the Baptist was imprisoned.

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.
Matthew 5:17 – 18

The term ‘The Law or The Prophets’ is a conceptual expression meaning everything written in the Holy Christian Scriptures from the Book of Genesis to the Book of Malachi. That is all of the sections of the Christian Bible that today is known as The Old Testament. ‘The Law’ refers to the five books of Moses (as Moses' work as the main human agent or Angel or Messenger, of these works) and ‘The Prophets’ refers to all the other books (as the work of all the rest of the Prophets of GOD, until the time of the First Advent).

What does that mean ‘Do not think that I came to destroy………?’ That means to destroy was not and never the mission of JESUS as the SON of man, at all absolutely.

Not to destroy what? ‘The Law or the Prophets.’

It is clear then that JESUS CHRIST was not sent by HIS FATHER to destroy or do away with or abolish, ‘The Law or the Prophets’. So what did HE come to do with regard to, ‘The Law or the Prophets’?

I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.

To fulfill what? ‘The Law and the Prophets.’

And what does that mean, ‘Come to fulfill The Law or the Prophets’?

HE came down from Heaven to be the full expression of ‘the Law and the Prophets’, performing everything written in ‘the Law and the Prophets’ concerning HIM and the work that HE would do upholding, keeping, performing and magnifying (Isaiah 42:21) HIS FATHER and all of HIS FATHER’s commandments, living by every word of HIS FATHER (Matthew 4:4).

HE is the substance of which the Law and the Prophets were a shadow of. The Law and The Prophets points to HIM and the mission HE would come down from Heaven to fulfill, that is to perform to the fullest. And that mission is two fold; firstly in HIS First Advent as the MEDIATOR and MESSENGER of The Covenant to institute or put into effect the New Covenant of which the Old Testament Passover pointed to or is a Type of. And HE will come again a second time to destroy all the wicked and to reward HIS faithful Elect (Revelation 11:18; 22:12) restoring the Kingdom of GOD to the Promise Land (Acts 1:6) and from there rule over the nations of the world (Daniel 2:44; Revelation 11:15) with HIS Saints, all those who have entered into the New Covenant and kept it without ever seeking to break it throughout their whole lives.

The New Covenant commemorative observation and performance is indicative of a true Christian but is not necessarily definitive unless the individual also continues to faithfully without alteration to either the manner (annual calendar date and time) or the symbols (wine and unleavened bread) keep it and continued on in unwavering persistence in hisher (i.e. his or her) commitment to obey GOD, seeking to do GOD's will and work for himher, and keep the righteous requirement of honoring (acknowledging and teaching of the requirement), performing (abiding and living by) and upholding (testifying as a witness against all who seek to nullify and invalidate, or who break andor seek to break) the Royal Laws and Holy Commandments of GOD, throughout until the end of hisher temporary physical life.

I will divert a little here to discuss another amazing thing about the world encompassing Christianity and one of the most, if not the most important thing about the message of Gospel.
Professed “Christianity” has been studying and teaching about JESUS CHRIST and the message HE brought from the FATHER for a good part of two thousand years but none seems to understand what these four Gospel accounts recorded, what was the main message focus. Near all of professed “Christianity” have been totally unable or unwilling to understand the Gospel message in the context of JESUS CHRIST’s main mission in HIS First Advent.
They all spoke of grace, of salvation, of redemption, of GOD sacrificing HIS SON to save the world through HIM, of the need by mankind for salvation and deliverance from sin and how GOD has provided this salvation in the person of HIS SON JESUS CHRIST. They spoke of the Kingdom of GOD, of the beautiful person of JESUS CHRIST and just about anything and everything that you can gleam out from the Gospel and the New Testament records, all except the one most important, crucial and critical thing. Practically each and every single one of them have completely left out any mention at all of the main mission of JESUS, the overview over riding mission, the central point to, and the focus of JESUS CHRIST’s mission. And that was the instituting of the New Covenant through which Grace and all the good and desired things that all these professed Christianities speak of, can be brought about.
Yes, they have all intentionally left out (by deliberately pretending stupidity) the single most important thing, the one and only thing that made possible all the other things they claimed were JESUS's mission, and that is the New Covenant that must be literally without variation absolutely, kept, honored, obeyed and performed to be able to receive Grace and forgiveness that the redemption and salvation from sin and death can be effected, so that all who repent will be able to enter into the Kingdom of GOD at JESUS CHRIST's Second Advent.
Yet no one asked why.  Why have all of professed Christianities left out the number one reason JESUS CHRIST was born as a SON of man to carry out and put into effect? If anyone is wandering, here is the reason: because if they do then every one of the truly sincere person who love and fear GOD will wonder and ask themselves, ‘Why then did the Catholics and all of the Protestants changed it to Easter Sunday?’ Why have they all taught and advanced the forsaking and outlawing of the Covenant made in the BLOOD of JESUS CHRIST to instead keep the Easter Covenant of the pagan goddess Ishtar (also Eostre, Ostara and several other ancient pagan goddess including the goddess of mercy of the Eastern religions, were the derivative, iterations andor the spin offs from the original Ishtar) of the Babylonian Mystery Religion?
What does all these things mean?
And that is exactly how anyone who wished to learn whether someone who preached JESUS CHRIST is truly Christian or Antichrist. Because no true Christian will preach the breaking of the New Everlasting Covenant, whereas every agent of Satan the Devil will preached precisely that, twisting the Scriptures to say something that it did not say, which in this case has been the purported celebratiion of CHIRST's resurrection as the Passover so that none may enter into to honor and keep the New Covenant to avail of the Grace which redeems them from the penalty of death incurred by their their sins (all the evil deeds carried out and evil words spoken in the course of their lives).
Things cannot get any simpler than this yet all of professed Christianity cannot understand it, all have completely, fully and totally just plainly, stubbornly, wickedly refused to understand. AMAZING!
However the truth seeker needs to understand that there has been a lot of deception being forwarded regarding the keeping of the Passover. Even as today a few hundred “Christians” groups, eachall claiming themselves either as Christians or even as the actual andor faithful true Church of GOD, all advance the keeping of the Passover but they have changed it either the forms (material used) or the day (from the ordained day) or the time (from the ordained time at sunset) or the season (the season of the Feast of Unleavened Bread), or even keeping it exactly on some years but at different times in other years. This they do through implicitly advancing that it is not really all that important and it can be kept at other times either additionally or solely. Mainstream “Christianity”  forwarded the lie that the Passover should be kept on the day of CHRIST purported resurrection which they purported was on Easter Sunday. How they could pull off such a brazen and blatant lie, testified to how masterful they are at twisting the Holy Christian Scriptures to say just whatever they want it to say.
Other “Christians” some of whom do not hold to some of the main doctrines of the Christmas religion centered around Christmas, Easter, Sunday and Trinity, advanced their own version of the commemoration of this New Covenant Passover many advocating that it can be kept as often as one chooses or on a different date (either [1] on some years or on all years, by claiming either that the calculation of the calendar was incorrect or [2] that twilight or evening of the 14th actually meant the end of the 14th day and the beginning of the 15th, and definitely not the beginning of the 14th as explicitly and plainly recorded in the Gospel accounts). All these they are able to do pulling a fast one over their disciples because of their central doctrinal dogma or framework where they implicitly advanced that the Old Testament Scriptures are irrelevant today because now all are under the New Covenant, and because of that, only what they and only they teach and command are relevant because they are these proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of GOD.

And what does it mean, “till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law.

In that statement JESUS CHRIST confirmed that all of the commandments of GOD and teachings recorded in the Old Testament Scriptures would be valid and relevant even until heaven and earth had passed away (i.e. is no more or no longer exist). Has that happen yet, heaven and earth passing away (or ceasing to exist)? And of course you must by now know who had been advocating that the Old Testament Scriptures of the Christian Bible are no longer valid and relevant. And you must know who had changed the Ten Commandments and all the other things that the Christian Holy Scriptures taught and commanded, removing, adding so as to alter whatever they wanted (Deuteronomy 12:32; Revelation 22:18 -19) in order to advance whatever they wanted their disciples to obey through their doctrines and their commandments and decrees.

Now how about the very last part at the end of that statement that said ‘till all is fulfilled’, what does that mean?

It means until everything written in the Christian Holy Scriptures, yes until the very last word in the Book of Revelation had come to pass, had happened.

You should know full well that the “Christianity” of the world teaches that the Old Testament no longer has any relevant for Christians of today because they, these “Christians”, are under grace, under the New Covenant, a covenant that they refused to honor and keep instead teaching and advocating the keeping of a totally fabricated lie in Easter Sunday. How does that square with what JESUS CHRIST taught in the New Testament as I have expounded above?

But that is not all they, these “Christian” hold to any of the New Testament teachings either, nope, not even the very New Covenant that they all claimed they are all under. This too I have very clearly shown from what I have discussed so far until this point. Now wait till you read all the rest of this work in all the Christian blogs of this author.

It seems these “Christian” masters are under grace through the New Covenant for one reason and one reason only. And that reason is to do away with everything that really matters that were instituted, taught and commanded by the Holy Christian Scriptures, both the Old Testament and the New Testament, so that they can intoxicate you into doing their bidding, to do everything they teach and commanded you, which are all from their putrid imagination of their corrupt minds (2 Peter 2:1 – 2, 12 – 14, 19 – 21) feeding off your gullibility, enriching themselves and securing their livelihood while they plunder, abuse, rape, torture and murder all they can get away with.

The Sabbath Changed By JESUS?

It had been advanced by the whole of the Christmas religion that it was implicit in the Gospel record that the seventh day, the Sabbath day (Saturday in today’s calendar) is no longer to be observed but Christian should observe Sunday as the so called “Lord’s day”? Is it true that was what JESUS was implicitly advancing in all the Gospel accounts? How about where it was explicitly recorded in the Gospel accounts that HE broke the Sabbath (John 5:18)?

First understand the perspective of the Gospel account that recorded that JESUS purportedly broke the Sabbath.

During one of the Feasts of GOD, the celebration of which had been changed by the Jews to their convenience, JESUS CHRIST healed a man who had an illness for thirty-eight years. And that happened on the Sabbath. The Jewish religious authorities charged that HE had broken the Sabbath commandment by working on that day.

The man departed and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had made him well.
For this reason the Jews persecuted Jesus, and sought to kill Him, because He had done these things on the Sabbath. But Jesus answered them, “My Father has been working until now, and I have been working.”
Therefore the Jews sought all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God.
John 5:15 – 18

Next understand the office of JESUS CHRIST as LORD of the Sabbath (Mark 2:28) - the one who made and owns the Sabbath (Genesis 2:3; Exodus 20:10; Ezekiel 20:10), its OWNER MASTER (Luke 6:5). Also know that HE is the MESSIAH who is the forever High Priest of GOD (Hebrew 3:1 – 3, 6:20).

Then read these verses and honestly tell me that you have no idea what it means (this is addressed to the masters and experts of the Christmas religion).

Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath, and are blameless? Yet I say to you that in this place there is One greater than the temple.
Matthew 12:5 – 6

If a man receives circumcision on the Sabbath, so that the law of Moses should not be broken, are you angry with Me because I made a man completely well on the Sabbath?
John 7:23

What were the works of priests of GOD? When did they do this work? Now tell me what did the priests of GOD do every Sabbath and Holy Days in the Old Testament when the Israelite came before them to worship GOD and to present their offerings as a burnt offering? Did the priest only ministered on the six days of the week and refused to do their work to minister to the people on the Sabbath and Holy Days?

Likewise the people of the land shall worship at the entrance to this gateway before the LORD on the Sabbaths and the New Moons. The burnt offering that the prince offers to the LORD on the Sabbath day shall be six lambs without blemish, and a ram without blemish; and the grain offering shall be one ephah for a ram, and the grain offering for the lambs, as much as he wants to give, as well as a hin of oil with every ephah.
Ezekiel 46:3 – 5

So if it was legal for these Levites prieststo break” the Sabbath, how about the MESSIAH and forever High Priest of GOD, JESUS CHRIST? If JESUS CHRIST worked (i.e. did or performed) the work of GOD on the Sabbath would that mean HE had broken the Sabbath; that HE had sinned?

Let it be clear that the four commandment forbids the doing of our work, our preoccupation with our livelihood and maintenance. It never forbid anyone from doing of the work of GOD. This is why from the Old Covenant period through to this very day, all those who minister during the Sabbath and Holy Days (or for that matter everyall days) to the work of GOD have been blameless (Matthew 12:5).

Read again the Sabbath commandment.

“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work,
Exodus 20:8 – 9

Observe the Sabbath day, to keep it holy, as the Lord your God commanded you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work,
Deuteronomy 5:12 – 13

Now can you understand why JESUS CHRIST said of the religious leaders of those days:

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith. These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone. Blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
Matthew 23:23 - 24

And while we are on the point of the Sabbath let us also be clear that JESUS CHRIST did not come to change the Passover commemoration either. HE came to fulfill it (to replace the Type with the Actual intended) because HE is ‘the LAMB of GOD WHO takes away the sin of the world’ (John 1:29) of which the Old Testament Passover points to or is a Type or shadow of. JESUS is the actual Passover (1 Corinthians 5:7) the Type of which was the Passover kept by the ancient Israelite; but not the Jews during the days of the Gospel records because those self righteous Jewish authorities had changed the keeping of the Passover to their convenience (Mark 7:9) commemorating it on the 15th of Nisan instead of the 14th.

Also in the same way the Day of Pentecost (i.e. Feast of Firstfruits) is the actual fulfillment of which the same Old Testament Feast of Firstfruits aka Feast of Weeks points to. The Day of Pentecost aka Feast of Firstfruits (Acts 2:1), the very day the New Testament Church of GOD was formed or founded (Acts 2:2 – 4) was the fulfillment of the Feast of First Fruits (aka Feast of Weeks) kept by the Israelite as a Type during their wandering in the wilderness and through the few periods when they were faithful in their covenant with GOD during both the times of the United Kingdom as well as the Divided Kingdoms of Israel and Judah.

Some may ask at this point, ‘How come in the records of the Gospel accounts there was no explicit record of JESUS CHRIST stating specifically or emphasizing directly that HIS disciples and followers need to obey all the Ten Commandments.

I sure hope none of reading this is asking this question because if you are you must surely know that you are none other than the rule based hair splitter that I railed against. To all these rule based hair splitters, I say unless you repent of your closed mind and myopic tunnel vision you will never be able to understand the message of Christian Holy Scriptures because all you will see ever are a big bunch of confusing rules. You can never put two and two together to get four, all you will ever get is two and two no matter how many million times you add them together (this is a hyperbole). Start thinking and reasoning in concepts rather than be totally fixed, obsessed and focused on rules. Start seeing the whole forest and not just a bunch of individual trees.

JESUS CHRIST came to the Jews of the ancient nation of Judah (the three tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi). These people knew of the thorough need to keep the Ten Commandments and all of the Law of Moses (Matthew 23:23; Luke 18:18 – 21), their whole nation was previously destroyed and they, the fore parents of these Jews, carried off as slave because of failing to keep and obey these commandments (Jeremiah 29:1). The Jewish religious authorities and experts believed and hold themselves to be perfect examples of law and commandment keeping. But of course they were not, they were just self righteous religious hypocrites and bigots (Mark 7:6 – 12; 12:38; Matthew 23:23 – 24, 28 – 35), that was why they plotted to murder the LORD of those laws and commandments. This is exactly as today, almost all the Elect of GOD, all those inside and outside the membership of the Church of GOD today, are self righteous religious hypocrites and bigots, all of them hating this work (because it testified against them and exposed their lust driven agenda and lives, their naked shame of ego supergorging lust being paraded for all the world of mankind and the Angelic Spirits to witness) exposed by this author (Matthew 5:22; 1 John 3:10, 14 – 15; 4:20 – 21).

Understand this — the main focus of the four Gospel records were to bear witness and testify to the advent of the MESSIAH, HIS Life as a SON of man, and the primary mission of HIS First Advent as a ‘LAMB of GOD’ to institute the New Covenant through HIS shed BLOOD. All these culminated with HIS death as the ‘LAMB of GOD WHO takes away the sin of the world’. With that death HE signified or instituted or put into effect the New Covenant with the BLOOD (Hebrews 9:18; 10:29) HE shed as HE died. The very same death also saw the end of the Covenant made with the ancient nations of Judah and Israel, the Covenant that was made in Horeb at Mount Sinai (Deuteronomy 5:2). That was what the four Gospel accounts were focusing on and testifying to — the advent of the LORD MESSIAH as the MESSENGER and MEDIATOR of the Covenant in the person of the SON of GOD to establish the New Covenant in the Passover through HIS death and the BLOOD HE shed dying as the ‘LAMB of GOD WHO takes away the sin of the world’.

The focus of the message that JESUS CHRIST brought in HIS First Advent was that: the time had begun (‘is fulfilled’ or had arrived) for the message on the soon coming Kingdom of GOD that is to rule over all of mankind (Daniel 2:44), to begin to  be preached from that time (Luke 16:16) in place of ‘the Law and the Prophets’. That was the reason most of the parables HE gave were to illustrate this message that GOD would soon be ushering in HIS Kingdom restoring it to Israel and from there to eventually rule over this entire earth (Daniel 2:44; Revelation 11:15; 20:4). There was not a need to reiterate to the Jews and the Jewish religious authority that they must keep all the Ten Commandments or the Sabbath or to obey ‘the Law and the Prophetsbecause these things all those living in Judea then, fully knew was an explicit requirement of their Covenant with GOD.

The need to keep the Ten Commandments (Matthew 5:19), the Holy Days and all of the Law and the Prophets (Matthew 5:17 – 18; Malachi 4:4) were implicit to the whole situation in Judea during the time of the Gospel records. JESUS CHRIST also knew full well that by the End of the Age of man the whole world would have embraced a great counterfeit “Christianity” that will advance the evil doctrine that the ‘Law and The Prophets’ had already been abolished or done away through the Grace that came in the New Covenant. Why else do you think JESUS, when HE started teaching HIS disciples, emphasized that HE did not come to destroy (or abolish or do away with) the ‘Law and the Prophets’? Because JESUS knew even then that was what the Christmas religion would be doing throughout the centuries until the very End of this Ageadvocating the lie (John 8:44) that the ‘Law and the Prophets’ had been abolished by the New Covenant.

I hope you can now see that the message of the Christian Bible is not complicated at all. The reason it is complicated and hard to understand for the masters and disciples of the Christmas religion and all those who listened to and believed them is because these have all been gotten totally drunk by the evil doctrines (delicacies) and celebrations (luxuries/revelries) of the Great Harlot church and her daughter churches (Revelation 18).

Other Things To Understand.

As I wrote earlier language is a tool or conveyance (i.e. transportation object) to communicate our ideas, thoughts, contemplations and emotions. It is a primary tool (i.e. process mechanism) in the conduct of interpersonal relationship and serves to ensure we can have workable beneficial relationships that will not lead us to ultimately harm andor destroy one another. On top of that it also serves as a bonding element for our relationships. It is not my intention to cover all the aspects and nuances of language as a communication tools but only the essentials so that we can understand the message of GOD for us.

Below then are some remaining concepts that we need to understand in communication.

Absolute And Relative.

Absolute statements pertain to absolute truth and things that applies all the time to the specific context. This means that they are applicable only in specific situations outside of which they have no real (as opposed to imagined, fantasized, fabricated, postulated, hypothesized andor theorized) meaning or no reality expression. An example of an absolute statement which is also definitive would be 1 John 3:4.

Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.
 1 John 3:4

That verse basically says that sin (i.e. the definition of what is sin) is when we act or speak in a manner unguided or unconstrained by anything, by any considerations. That means there are no rules, no law and thus no requirement for conformance and we can behave anyway and anyhow we want. This statement alone convicts all those who taught andor are teaching that there is nothing we need to do to receive Grace, meaning no repentance is required plus also there are no more rules and laws that we need to abide by. Read the discussion on repentance to find out what repentance means. What need to be noted is that this is applicable only when referencing behavior and intentions. That means it has a limited context where it is valid irregardless of time.

Other absolute statements:

All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.
John 1:3

Relative type statements are those that are very ‘perspective’ and ‘context’ sensitive. Relative type statements are thus also comparative and also subjective statements and can be as they are also used as comparison of different: situations and circumstances; perspectives and contexts; and intensity and degree.

The sun rises every morning' ‘is an example of a relative statement. Wake up, it is morning’ is a time sensitive and location specific statement.

The concepts in the words ‘good’ and ‘evil’ as well as ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ are absolute concepts in some specific contexts. This means that they are applicable only in specific situations outside of which they have no real (as opposed to imagined, fantasized, fabricated, postulated, hypothesized andor theorized) meaning or no reality expression. Good and evil, right and wrong carry absolute values when the context is that of behavior and intent in intelligence based relationships among individuals. This is also true when the context is that of conferrable benefits and desirable benefits whether positive or negative where such are involved.

So are the concepts in the words ‘truth’ and ‘lies’. Truth also has a concept of factual (as a valid expression in reality) with an opposing concept of untruth andor erroneous.

For example the word ‘good’ depending on the context use can carry a relative concept such as when we say, ‘This is good but that is better.’ (1 Corinthians 7:38). In such a case the context is that of comparing intensity or degree and does not carry the same meaning as when it is measured against the concept of 'evil.' Just as the word ‘right’ carry two different concepts depending on the context of use. ‘Left’ and ‘right’ are relative and is direction dependent so the word ‘right’ when use in this context do not carry the same meaning as when it is compared or measured against ‘wrong’ which carry the concept of incorrect, invalid andor erroneous.

The mathematical concepts of percentages, fractions and ratios are relative concepts to a single whole or a single summation. ‘An elephant is a big animal’ is another relative concept in the word ‘big’. Words that are used to compare two or more objects or subjects; to compare through quantification or measurement, all carry a relative context.

Specific and General, Definitive and Indicative.

Specific statements are true to a specific situation, circumstance or time. These are what I called context sensitive statements. An example of time sensitive statements from the Holy Christian Scriptures is:

But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
Mark 13:32

This statement was only true and valid until JESUS CHRIST's death and resurrection (Matthew 28:18; Revelation 11:3, 11). Further, once it is fulfilled at CHRIST's Second Coming it will no longer be true any more except as a reference to the original time of the statement and relevant to that contextual time period. So it is both a relative type statement as well as a situation (certain time duration) specific statement. Those are the contexts of that statement, the situational realities and its time sensitive (specific) validity.

One of the time specific context is also because of the situational realities when the statement was made. JESUS CHRIST was at that time a SON of man, meaning fully a physical made of dust man, like all other physical man (includes women) and therefore HIS Mind was fully accessible to Satan the Devil and all the Angelic personages (all the Spirit personages). This would mean that anything JESUS would know all the Spirit personages including Satan the Devil and his cohorts demons would know. Therefore it would be necessary that HIS knowledge would be limited as it was not GOD's intent for ‘the day and hour’ (as well as many other things kept hidden then) to be made known, not until JESUS had ascended to the ‘Third Heaven’ from where the LORD JESUS would later revealed it to the Apostle John after all the rest of the Apostles had died. That information was intended to be hidden until the Time of End or the End of the Age at the ‘last hour’ where it would be revealed by the Elijah Fulfillment (Malachi 4:5) as a sign and testimony to his office (role and work responsibility). That was the reason that while all the information revealed in the Book of Revelation to the Apostle John almost two thousand years ago were not fully (but were only rudimentary) understood by all mankind. Even the very Angels (or human Messengers) to the Church of GOD from the time of the Apostolic days to today (in both the sole Messenger (deceased) to the Church of GOD in Philadelphia and the the first two Messengers (one since deceased) of the Church of GOD in Laodicea), none of these have any significant understanding of many of the referenced objects and referenced prophetic events of the Book of Revelation.

The statement ‘I am thirsty’ is a context sensitive statement and applies in specific recurring instances. So too are the statements: I am hungry, I am sleepy, I am tired. Then of course, there is also the greater implicit context where the ‘I’ mentioned has to be a living physical creature, someone (whose live is temporary sustain by air, fluid and other nutrients) who is alive and conscious to be able to articulate.

Definitive statements are usually, but not always, also specific and absolute depending again on the context where the usage is applicable. Some simple examples:

Those who do wickedness or act in a wicked manner are wicked.

A sinner is one who sins.

Love does no harm to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.
Romans 13:10

Those statements quoted above are definitive as also is this following verse:

If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?
1 John 4:20

In the above verse, loving GOD is defined as also loving and not hating (i.e. adhoring and harboring feelings of disdain against) one's brother (i.e. brethren aka of having the same parentage from the Spiritual context). Definitive statements are always absolute in whatever context where the definition is applicable, where the defined objects (i.e. love and hate in this example) and subjects (i.e. GOD and brethren) are relevant.

Indicative carries the concept of some probability. Examples: mammals are warm blooded; birds have wings; human have poor night vision as compared to cats; etc.


In overview the basic requirements to understand the teachings of the Christian Holy Scriptures are:
1. To have an average human level intelligence, some common sense rational thinking with an ability to grasp concept, context and perspective.
2. An ability and sincere willingness to thoroughly research and study to get the ‘whole picture’ rather than isolated disconnected rules. A meek, humble and noble attitude to diligently study and verify against all the relevant Scriptures collectively and objectively before trying to come to some understanding.
3. A sincere unwavering heart and mind to want to learn the truth.
4. A positive trust (or faith and unwavering full conviction) based attitude with proper mitigatory fear and reverence towards GOD and HIS Words.
5. A truly repentant and humble attitude of gratitude and fearful reverence towards GOD. Not the self justifying, falsely zealous, and self deceptively humble minds such as were those Jews and religious authorities in the four Gospel accounts.
6. No self expedient, self seeking, self glorifying agenda to twist the Christian Holy Scriptures to one's own reasoning and emotional inclinations concerning certain concepts such as: what one feels is right or wrong or how one thinks something should be.
7. Due diligence (on best effort) in sincere study and contrite prayers seeking first and foremost to seek to do GOD's will, to obey GOD and love GOD as GOD loves us.

The Scriptures of Truth as recorded is meant for all the contritely (as opposed to the brazenly and arrogantly pretendingrepentant men (includes women) to understand. They are not for the unstable faithless, the insincere hypocrites and bigots, the myopic tunnel vision hairsplitters, the ego gorgingrocket scientists”, the agents and disciples of Satan the Devil, and the wicked predators and parasites of mankind. That is why none of these can ever understand, not unless they first repent of their bad faith and wickedness (Daniel 12:10).

Explicit Doctrines Of Implicit Blasphemies [eximblasp]

{ – Please note that this section of this discussion is an extract from the discussion ‘The So Called Abrahamic Religion – Know The Basic’ of the post ‘Why Create Life Through The Process Of Evolution’ of this blog. This extract will be added here once the discussion ‘The So Called Abrahamic Religion – Know The Basic’ has completely published in the post ‘Why Create Life Through The Process Of Evolution – }


THE OLD TESTAMENT AND THE NEW TESTAMENT.   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11i   11ii   11iii   11iv   12   13   14i   14ii   14iii


*1 Bible 101 – The Holy Bible Expounded is a book (under development) expounding the true message of the Christian Bible by this author. Extracts from this book are available for a period of time at

Comments and questions on issues of doctrines, truths and facts raised here can be directed to this author through the contact form on the right side bar of this author's main blog.. Only sincere non malicious comments and questions seeking clarification and understanding will be entertained.

1. Words in italic referenced titles, proper names or quoted speeches where this applies, otherwise these are personal notes to people who are familiar with them. Words in red are meant to call the attention of the reader to the discussion points of the post title.
2. Please refer to the Special Note at the main About Page of this work for the contextual basis of the discussions of this blog. All intending first time readers of this work are advised to first read the content warning before deciding whether they want to continue reading any of this work (please see also the disclaimer at the bottom of this post).
3. The sincere truth seeking intending readers are recommended to study this work beginning with the first post in each main discussion thread (in the respective blog of this work) so as to be to fully comprehend the full context of the messages communicated.
4. Scriptures quoted are from New King James Version unless otherwise indicated. Anyone who wants to prove or disprove what is written here should first read the Christian Bible thoroughly and extensively (from cover to cover at least three or more times) with the goal that of basic reading comprehension, to understand what was recorded. The various chapters and articles discussed here are by no means exhaustive of the doctrines, prophesies, subjects and answers to questions on the Christian Holy Scriptures.
5. The word or term 'man' is used throughout as a reference to man specifically as well as to all mankind (male and female) generally according to the context in the exact same way as the Christian Bible used the term.
6. While the early discussions of this work covered basic foundation doctrines, the later discussions in this work discussed more in depth teachings and doctrines some of which may not be fully comprehensible without first understanding the foundation, fundamental or basic doctrines discussed earlier (before 2014 C.E.) in the various other blogs of this work.
7. For the complete listing of titles of the discussions of this author on the Christian faith and worship (or religion) please refer to the Start or Home page of 'The Holy Bible Expounded'. Also listed in this main posts listing page are the latest published posts of all the Christian topic blogs of this author.
8. The extensively lavish use of hyperbole and extreme superlatives in this work is intended to highlight the glaringly extreme ego supergorging lust of mankind and particularly near all the Elect of GOD both leaders and lay members, both inside and outside of the membership of the one true Church of GOD in this last days.

© Quah 2009 - 2015. All rights reserved.

All references to GOD (in caps or uppercase), in this site refers to the CREATOR GOD whose original inspired Words are the basis of the Christian Bible, unless otherwise denoted. All other references to the term ‘God’, or ‘Gods’ (without full all caps or all uppercase) are as these terms are generally used by mankind to denote the deity, God, or Gods of their religions and belief systems and thus may or may not refer to The GOD of the Christian Holy Scriptures.
All published information on these Christian topics are targeted at the true disciples of the faiththe Elect, not the false and fraudulent professed believers. Those of other religious faitn and worship who are easily offended by simple. clear and obvious truth are advised not to read any of the blog's entries of this work.
All views, statements and discussions are the personal religious belief and conviction of this author and directed at persons of same faith, religious belief and conviction.
Nonetheless any truly sincere seeker of the CREATOR of all things should be able to related to and understand the topic, if seeking said CREATOR in truth and contrite humility, seeking to understand and to learn.
All those who are not interested in, or not seeking to know the truth should not read materials and articles by this author in his books or blogs as the simple, clear and obvious truth will most probably offend their sensitivity and infuriate them. As such they are advised (i.e. warned) against reading any of this work.
The author is neither responsible for nor does he approve or endorse any advertisement for subscriptions, products or services advertised in this blog space.
Please note that all discussions by this author are based on a general non expert assessment of information gathered from material published in the public domain (i,e, readily available to members of the general public). All of this author's discussions are presented as material for any and all persons with no special expertise. Anyone twelve years of age and older, who is not mentally incapacitated in some ways, would (or should anyway) be able to understand any and all the discussions of this author by following the discussions in the posted chronological order in each blog starting from the first post and first published blog. You do not need to be an expert or a genius to understand the simple and straight forward truths discussed by this author.

Last Updated: 2015 11 21
First Posted: 2011 02 02

No comments:

Post a Comment